Month: July 2024

Lodging a Zero FIR under BNSS: A Step-by-Step Guide

Lodging a Zero FIR under BNSS: A Step-by-Step Guide

Navigating the legal landscape can be daunting, especially when dealing with procedures like filing a Zero FIR. This blog will demystify the process and provide a comprehensive guide on lodging a Zero FIR under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023.

Step 1: Filing the Complaint

To begin, a complainant can approach any police station, regardless of where the crime occurred. This flexibility is granted under Section 173(1) BNSS, which allows the complainant to lodge a complaint in any jurisdiction.

Step 2: Recording the Zero FIR

Upon receiving information about a cognizable offence committed outside the territorial jurisdiction, the Station House Officer (SHO) or the officer on duty records the details in the Zero FIR register. The case is registered as a Zero FIR or \’O\’ FIR under the relevant sections of law.

Section 173(1) of BNSS states:

  • Information about a cognizable offence can be given orally or via electronic communication.
  • If given orally, the officer must write it down, read it back to the informant for confirmation, and then get it signed by the informant.
  • If given electronically, it must be recorded and signed by the informant within three days, and the details must be entered into a prescribed book.
  • For offences under Sections 64-71, 74-79, or 124 of BNS, 2023, information provided by women must be recorded by a female police officer or any female officer.
  • If the complainant is mentally or physically disabled, the information must be recorded at their residence or a convenient location in the presence of an interpreter or special educator, and the recording must be videotaped. The statement must also be recorded by a Judicial Magistrate as soon as possible.

Step 3: Preliminary Enquiry

Section 173(3) BNSS permits a preliminary enquiry for cognizable offences punishable by three to seven years. The officer-in-charge may, with prior permission from an officer of at least Deputy Superintendent of Police rank, conduct this enquiry to ascertain if there is a prima facie case within fourteen days or proceed with the investigation if a prima facie case exists.

Step 4: Registration and Copy to Complainant

Once the requirements under Section 173 BNSS are met, the officer registers the Zero FIR, prefixed with \”Zero\” to indicate its nature. A copy of the recorded information is given to the informant or victim free of charge, as per Section 173(2) BNSS. If necessary, preliminary investigations (such as a medical examination of a rape victim) may be conducted by the same police station.

Step 5: Transfer

The Zero FIR is forwarded to the police station that has jurisdiction over the place where the incident occurred.

Step 6: Re-registration

The receiving police station re-registers the Zero FIR as a regular FIR in their records.

Step 7: Investigation

The SHO assigns the FIR to an investigating officer who proceeds with the investigation according to standard procedures under BNSS.

Step 8: Updates to Complainant

Regular updates on the investigation are provided to the complainant, ensuring transparency and keeping them informed of the progress.

Remedies for Non-Registration of Zero FIR by Police Officers

If a police officer refuses to record the information, the aggrieved person has two primary remedies:

  1. Remedy under Section 173(4) BNSS

If a police officer in charge refuses to record the information, the aggrieved person can send the substance of the information in writing and by post to the Superintendent of Police. If the Superintendent of Police is satisfied that the information discloses the commission of a cognizable offence, they will either investigate the case themselves or direct a subordinate officer to investigate. If the Superintendent of Police fails to act, the aggrieved person may apply to the Magistrate.

  1. Remedy under Section 199 BNS

Section 199 BNS addresses the disobedience by public servants:

  • A public servant who knowingly disobeys any legal direction prohibiting them from requiring a person\’s attendance for investigation purposes.
  • A public servant who knowingly disobeys any other legal direction regulating the manner of conducting an investigation, to the prejudice of any person.
  • A public servant who fails to record any information given under subsection (1) of Section 174 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, related to cognizable offences punishable under Sections 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71, 73, 77, 124, 143, or 144.

Such violations shall be punishable with rigorous imprisonment for a term of not less than six months, which may extend to two years, and may also include a fine.

Conclusion

Understanding the procedure for lodging a Zero FIR under BNSS is crucial for ensuring that justice is served promptly and effectively. This guide provides a step-by-step approach to navigate this legal process, ensuring that your rights are protected and that the necessary legal protocols are followed.

For comprehensive information on law and order in India, please visit www.lawyersatish.com/blog and follow us on (LinkedIn, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram ). Should you require any support or assistance, you may submit your query directly on the website (www.layersatish.com ).

Abortion Laws in India: A Comprehensive Overview

Abortion Laws in India: A Comprehensive Overview

Introduction

Abortion laws in India are governed by the Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971, a pioneering piece of legislation at the time of its enactment. Over the years, this law has undergone several amendments to address changing societal needs and medical advancements. This article delves into the evolution, current state, and implications of abortion laws in India, highlighting key provisions, recent amendments, and the socio-legal context.

Historical Background

Before the MTP Act of 1971, abortion in India was criminalized under Section 312 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860, which considered it a punishable offense unless done to save the life of the woman. This led to a high incidence of unsafe abortions, contributing significantly to maternal morbidity and mortality. The need for a legal framework to ensure safe and regulated abortion practices prompted the enactment of the MTP Act.

The Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) Act, 1971

The MTP Act, 1971, was a landmark legislation that permitted abortion under specific conditions.

The Act aimed to:

  1. Reduce maternal mortality and morbidity from unsafe abortions.
  2. Provide a legal framework for safe abortion services.
  3. Protect medical practitioners from legal action if they performed abortions under specified conditions.

 Key Provisions of the MTP Act, 1971

  • Grounds for Abortion:
  • Risk to the life of the pregnant woman.
  • Grave injury to the physical or mental health of the woman.
  • Substantial risk of the child being born with serious physical or mental abnormalities.
  • Pregnancy resulting from rape.
  • Contraceptive failure (initially applicable only to married women).
  • Gestation Period:
  • Abortion was permitted up to 20 weeks of gestation.
  • Beyond 20 weeks, abortion was allowed only if the life of the woman was at risk.
  • Medical Practitioner\’s Opinion:
  • Up to 12 weeks: Opinion of one registered medical practitioner.
  • 12 to 20 weeks: Opinion of two registered medical practitioners.

 Amendments to the MTP Act

 MTP (Amendment) Act, 2002

The 2002 amendment aimed to enhance access to safe abortion services, particularly in rural areas. It included provisions for:

  • Training of registered medical practitioners.
  • Establishment of more abortion facilities in rural and underserved areas.

 MTP (Amendment) Act, 2021

The most significant changes to the MTP Act came with the 2021 amendment, which sought to make abortion laws more progressive and inclusive. Key provisions of the 2021 amendment include:

  • Extended Gestation Period:
    • Abortion is permitted up to 24 weeks for certain categories of women, including survivors of rape, incest, differently-abled women, minors, and those whose marital status changes during pregnancy (widowhood and divorce).
  • Medical Practitioner\’s Opinion:
    • Up to 20 weeks: Opinion of one registered medical practitioner.
    • 20 to 24 weeks: Opinion of two registered medical practitioners.
  • Beyond 24 Weeks:
    • Abortion is permitted in cases of substantial fetal abnormalities diagnosed by a Medical Board.
  • Confidentiality:
    • The privacy of the woman undergoing an abortion is protected, with her identity not to be revealed except to authorized persons.

Implementation and Challenges

Despite the progressive nature of the MTP Act and its amendments, several challenges remain in the implementation of abortion laws in India:

  • Access to Services: Many women, particularly in rural and remote areas, still lack access to safe abortion services due to a shortage of trained medical practitioners and facilities.
  • Awareness and Stigma: There is a significant lack of awareness about the legal provisions for abortion, and societal stigma continues to deter women from seeking safe abortions.
  • Healthcare Infrastructure: Inadequate healthcare infrastructure and resources often lead to delays and complications in accessing abortion services.

Socio-Legal Context

The socio-legal context of abortion in India is complex, influenced by cultural, religious, and societal factors. While the law provides for safe and legal abortions, societal attitudes often lag behind, perpetuating stigma and misinformation. Efforts to improve awareness and education about reproductive rights are crucial for the effective implementation of the MTP Act.

Global Comparison

India\’s abortion laws are considered relatively progressive compared to many other countries, especially with the recent amendments extending the permissible gestation period and expanding the categories of women eligible for abortion. However, there is still room for improvement in terms of accessibility and societal acceptance.

Conclusion

The evolution of abortion laws in India reflects a progressive approach towards women\’s reproductive rights and health. The MTP Act, along with its amendments, provides a robust legal framework for safe and regulated abortion services. However, effective implementation requires addressing challenges related to access, awareness, and societal attitudes. Continued efforts in these areas will ensure that the benefits of the law reach all women, contributing to improved maternal health and empowerment.

References

  • Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Medical Termination of Pregnancy (Amendment) Act, 2021.
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860.
  • \”The Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971.\” Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India.
  • \”Abortion and the Law in India.\” Center for Reproductive Rights.